RESEARCH

Research in the social sciences is the systematic investigation into and study of various social phenomena. The typical way scientific research is conducted is to first propose a hypothesis based on a theoretical model of the particular phenomenon which is sought to be explained and then empirically testing the validity of the hypothesis. To elaborate, the following are the crucial steps of any research in the social sciences.

I. LITERATURE

The very first step is to come up with the research question. Naturally, a research question has a background to it in the sense that it tries to improve upon the existing findings and explanations of a phenomenon. It is therefore incumbent on the researcher to locate her research question and her original contribution in the context of the existing body of academic work on the relevant subject. More

or go directly to:

II. THEORETICAL MODEL

Explaining any real-world situation or event is a complex exercise. For example, a simple question like “Why are house prices high in Vancouver?” can become intractable very soon if one does not limit oneself by a simplified and restricted view of a theoretical model. A model’s power stems from the elimination of irrelevant detail. Once a model is formed, it is used to generate empirically testable predictions. These are called hypotheses which are tested with statistical analysis of available data.

More on Theoretical Models

III. EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

The empirical analysis basically involves extracting patterns from available data that makes sense in the light of the theoretical model that is being used to explain the social phenomenon. The empirical analysis is usually carried out in two steps: first, the research question is empirically motivated by presenting basic patterns and trends in the data using different graphs and tables, and then formally testing the hypotheses of the theoretical model using statistical inference proceduresClick here for more 

or go directly to: 

IV. PAPER

Once the proposed theory is tested in the light of the data, the researcher needs to summarize the findings, and inform the reader about how such findings enhance the current knowledge of the subject matter under study, and also what potential directions future research can take in that area.  (continued – How to write a paper) Click here for more

After the researcher has provided evidence for or against the testable hypotheses concerning the mechanisms at work behind a particular socio-economic phenomenon, all the theoretical and empirical findings are collected in the Conclusion section of the article. In particular, if the empirical results contradict the predictions of theoretical framework considered, then it is extremely important to discuss what could have been the plausible factors that led to such disagreement between the model and the data. In other words, is there any particular assumption of the model that is counterfactual, or is there reason to believe that the data generating process is different from that considered in the model, and similar issues need to be addressed. The Conclusion section is also the place to discuss in brief how the results added to the existing understanding of the phenomenon, and point towards directions of future research in the relevant subject area.

More on

 

LITERATURE SEARCH | ANNOTATION | REVIEW

LITERATURE SEARCH

Mostly Secondary Sources | Peer Review Publications

Wide SearchHealth/ScienceBusiness
JSTOR

Google Scholar

Academic Search

PubMed

ScienceDirect

ABI/Inform

LexisNexis Academic

LITERATURE ANNOTATION

 

Excel Template

LITERATURE REVIEW

The very first step in any research design is to clearly state the research question. What is being explained? Just stating or knowing the research question will not be enough unless the finding is novel. Therefore, the researcher needs to say: What is new?

To know whether the finding is novel and what new things are being explored, one needs to know what the current wisdom is about the topic or related topics. Therein lies the importance of a literature review.

A literature review is exactly that — a review of the literature — a review of studies/research in journal articles and/or other publications that have already been conducted on your topic or subtopic. The Literature Review section should not merely describe and summarize the current information on the topic but also evaluate and compare the studies/research. More often than not, there will be apparent contradictions in the findings of different existing studies. It is the researcher’s job to shed light on the key differences and what underlying assumptions, or methodologies, or datasets lead to such differences. This will be helpful for placing the contribution of the current research work in the right context.

The literature review section plays a very important role in any research in the sense that familiarity with previous research will help in formulating your own research study. Once this literature review is developed, you will be in a better position to decide how to design a research method and collect and analyze the data. The literature review will further help you contrast and compare your results and conclusions with earlier research on the same question.

THEORETICAL MODEL

Social sciences proceed by developing models of social phenomena. By a model we mean a ‘simplified’ representation of reality. A model that attempts to describe every aspect of reality is quite useless. A model’s power stems from the elimination of irrelevant details, which allows the researcher to focus on the essential features of the reality that is being sought to be understood. In general, we want to adopt the simplest model that is capable of describing the economic situation we are examining. We can then add complications one at a time, allowing the model to become more complex and, consequently more realistic.

Let us consider a particular example of the market for apartments in a college town in the US. In this town there are two sorts of apartments. There are some that are adjacent to the university, and others that are farther away. The adjacent apartments are more desirable by students and faculty because of easier access to the university, and everyone would have been living in these adjacent apartments if they were able to afford it. Now suppose, as Economics researchers we are interested in estimating the supply curve of apartments adjacent to the university. How are we supposed to model this situation?

We will think of the apartments as being located in two large rings surrounding the uiversity. The adjacent apartments (henceforth denoted by A) are in the inner ring, while the rest (henceforth denoted by B) are located in the outer ring. We will focus exclusively on the market for A while treating the market for B as exogenous information. In other words, the price of B will be assumed to be an exogenous variable, while the price of the inner-ring is an endogenous variable. This means that the price of B is taken as determined by factors not discussed in the model, while the price of A is determined by forces described in the model. The first simplifying assumption will be that all A type apartments are identical in terms of their qualitative characteristics. In other words, our model is going to abstract from differences like number of bedrooms in each apartment, or the type of flooring in the apartment, etc. This will make speaking about “the price” of A meaningful, without worrying about quality differentials. But what determines the price of A? Typically the equilibrium price of anything depends on its demand and supply. We will simplify our model further by assuming that the parameters of the supply curve of A are not changing over time, that is, there is no shift of the supply curve. Given all these simplifying assumptions, any change in the observed quantity and price of A can be attributed to shifts of the demand curve. In fact, shifts of the demand curve causes changes in the equilibrium points which trace out the supply curve. In other words, demand shifts identify the supply. Now, the demand curve for A can shift for various reasons like the change in the number of students being admitted to the university, a change in the  price of B, a change in the preference of renters for A over B, etc. Thus, given a dataset on the prices and quantities of type A apartments over time, we can identify the supply curve of A, provided we are willing to make all the above modelling assumptions.

From the above example, it should be clear that answering even a simple question requires a theoretical framework with substantial amount of simplifying assumptions. Stating the theoretical model clearly not only helps to interpret the empirical results later on in the light of the predictions or hypotheses of the model, but also to argue why the empirical results might be different from the model predictions.

RESEARCH

Research in the social sciences is the systematic investigation into and study of various social phenomena. The typical way scientific research is conducted is to first propose a hypothesis based on a theoretical model of the particular phenomenon which is sought to be explained and then empirically testing the validity of the hypothesis. To elaborate, the following are the crucial steps of any research in the social sciences.

I. LITERATURE

The very first step is to come up with the research question. Naturally, a research question has a background to it in the sense that it tries to improve upon the existing findings and explanations of a phenomenon. It is therefore incumbent on the researcher to locate her research question and her original contribution in the context of the existing body of academic work on the relevant subject. More

or go directly to:

II. THEORETICAL MODEL

Explaining any real-world situation or event is a complex exercise. For example, a simple question like “Why are house prices high in Vancouver?” can become intractable very soon if one does not limit oneself by a simplified and restricted view of a theoretical model. A model’s power stems from the elimination of irrelevant detail. Once a model is formed, it is used to generate empirically testable predictions. These are called hypotheses which are tested with statistical analysis of available data.

More on Theoretical Models

III. EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

The empirical analysis basically involves extracting patterns from available data that makes sense in the light of the theoretical model that is being used to explain the social phenomenon. The empirical analysis is usually carried out in two steps: first, the research question is empirically motivated by presenting basic patterns and trends in the data using different graphs and tables, and then formally testing the hypotheses of the theoretical model using statistical inference proceduresClick here for more 

or go directly to: 

IV. PAPER

Once the proposed theory is tested in the light of the data, the researcher needs to summarize the findings, and inform the reader about how such findings enhance the current knowledge of the subject matter under study, and also what potential directions future research can take in that area.  (continued – How to write a paper) Click here for more

After the researcher has provided evidence for or against the testable hypotheses concerning the mechanisms at work behind a particular socio-economic phenomenon, all the theoretical and empirical findings are collected in the Conclusion section of the article. In particular, if the empirical results contradict the predictions of theoretical framework considered, then it is extremely important to discuss what could have been the plausible factors that led to such disagreement between the model and the data. In other words, is there any particular assumption of the model that is counterfactual, or is there reason to believe that the data generating process is different from that considered in the model, and similar issues need to be addressed. The Conclusion section is also the place to discuss in brief how the results added to the existing understanding of the phenomenon, and point towards directions of future research in the relevant subject area.

More on

 

LITERATURE SEARCH | ANNOTATION | REVIEW

LITERATURE SEARCH

Mostly Secondary Sources | Peer Review Publications

Wide SearchHealth/ScienceBusiness
JSTOR

Google Scholar

Academic Search

PubMed

ScienceDirect

ABI/Inform

LexisNexis Academic

LITERATURE ANNOTATION

 

Excel Template

LITERATURE REVIEW

The very first step in any research design is to clearly state the research question. What is being explained? Just stating or knowing the research question will not be enough unless the finding is novel. Therefore, the researcher needs to say: What is new?

To know whether the finding is novel and what new things are being explored, one needs to know what the current wisdom is about the topic or related topics. Therein lies the importance of a literature review.

A literature review is exactly that — a review of the literature — a review of studies/research in journal articles and/or other publications that have already been conducted on your topic or subtopic. The Literature Review section should not merely describe and summarize the current information on the topic but also evaluate and compare the studies/research. More often than not, there will be apparent contradictions in the findings of different existing studies. It is the researcher’s job to shed light on the key differences and what underlying assumptions, or methodologies, or datasets lead to such differences. This will be helpful for placing the contribution of the current research work in the right context.

The literature review section plays a very important role in any research in the sense that familiarity with previous research will help in formulating your own research study. Once this literature review is developed, you will be in a better position to decide how to design a research method and collect and analyze the data. The literature review will further help you contrast and compare your results and conclusions with earlier research on the same question.

DATA

I. Development and Global Health

United Nations Data

World Bank Data

Maternal and Child Health Data

Education

II. International Trade

Canada Trade Data

Global Antidumping Data

World Trade Organization (WTO) Antidumping Data

Regional Trade Agreements

World Bank Data

Country Profiles (WTO Data)

  • Trade Profiles (trade situation of members, observers and other selected economies)
  • Tariff Profiles (market access situation of members, observers and other selected economies)
  • Services Profiles (detailed statistics on key infrastructure services (transportation, telecommunications, finance and insurance) for selected economies.
  • Aid for Trade Profiles (download complete set of profiles)

Time Series Data

Trade Policy Measures

III. Country Level

IV. UBC

  • British Columbia Inter-University Research Data Centre
  • Available datasets:
  • Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS)
  • Ethnic Diversity Survey (EDS)
  • General Social Survey (GSS selected cycles)
  • Longitudinal Survey of Immigrants to Canada (LSIC)
  • National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth (NLSCY)
  • National Population Health Survey (NPHS)
  • Survey of Labour and Income Dynamics (SLID)
  • Workplace and Employee Survey (WES)
  • Youth in Transition Survey and the Programme for International Student Assessments (YITS-PISA)